img_1920_energy-rant

Energy Rant

Cut through the fluff with candid, expert takes on energy policy, programs, and industry trends. Written by our CEO, Jeff Ihnen, the Energy Rant is a blog that challenges assumptions, questions status quos, and delivers sharp insights with just the right dose of irreverence.

Strategic Energy Management or Strategic Anger Management – Which is Right for You?

Strategic Energy Management or Strategic Anger Management – Which is Right for You?

I have written about, and formally discussed, strategic energy management (SEM) so much I was sure I already wrote ...
Utility Scale vs Small Distributed Generation – Protection by Savage Suffolks

Utility Scale vs Small Distributed Generation – Protection by Savage Suffolks

The June issue of Public Utilities Fortnightly (PUF) featured a supplemental, special report in collaboration with ...
Building Energy Models – Less Useful Than You Think

Building Energy Models – Less Useful Than You Think

The convergence of several issues, and AESP’s Summer Conference, Technology – The Great Game Changer, gave me no ...
Betting with Deregulation – A Risky Proposition

Betting with Deregulation – A Risky Proposition

Energy is a commodity, and like all commodities, it is wise to hedge risk; not go the other way and place bets. ...
Performance Contracting – Getting it Right; Avoiding #1 Matches

Performance Contracting – Getting it Right; Avoiding #1 Matches

Per the Energy Services Coalition, energy service companies (ESCOs) that deliver energy savings performance ...
Utility Innovation – Smart Load Building, Yes; Smart Apps, Not so Much

Utility Innovation – Smart Load Building, Yes; Smart Apps, Not so Much

Constant, 60 Hertz, 120/208 Volt, 277/480 Volt power, 99.999% of the time. That’s it. That is all electric ...
FERC 745 – The Worst Order Ever Produced?

FERC 745 – The Worst Order Ever Produced?

Robert Borlick writes in Public Utilities Fortnightly that FERC Order 745 is “one of the worst orders FERC has ...
Market Forces Give (Carbon Reduction); Market Forces and Flawed Policy Take Away

Market Forces Give (Carbon Reduction); Market Forces and Flawed Policy Take Away

What is the purpose of the Clean Power Plan? To reduce emissions to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030? No. It ...
Learning Calculus via Demand and Energy

Learning Calculus via Demand and Energy

Last week, I was commenting on some retro-commissioning findings, and I was considering demand savings estimates ...
Cannabis – A Big Issue Coming to a Utility Near You

Cannabis – A Big Issue Coming to a Utility Near You

Every kilogram of marijuana produced has a carbon bigfoot print of 4.3 metric tonnes (4.7 tons) of CO2. Marijuana ...
Program Adoption Curves – Telephones and Televisions

Program Adoption Curves – Telephones and Televisions

There are certain energy efficiency programs that we are never going to pursue – all those that are in the late ...
Energy Efficiency Potential Studies – Unnecessary for Utility 2.0

Energy Efficiency Potential Studies – Unnecessary for Utility 2.0

A few weeks ago in Cost of Saved Energy, I received some great feedback and a few questions. The questions ...
No results found.

Subscribe to Receive Free Content

When you sign up to receive Michaels Energy content, you'll receive the latest and greatest from our energy experts on the following topics:

  • Energy Rant: This weekly blog, written by our CEO Jeff Ihnen, cuts through the fluff with candid, expert takes on energy policy, programs, and industry trends.
  • The Big Why of Evaluation: This monthly blog, found in our e-newsletter The Hopper, explores the purpose, process, and impact of energy program evaluation.
  • The Decarbonized Cold Chain: This new blog series provides insights on how the global cold chain can reduce emissions, increase efficiency, and build a  low-carbon future.

Though we hope you never get bored with us, we want you to know that you can update your e-newsletter preference anytime! Feel free to email marketing@michaelsenergy.com with feedback on content you'd like to see (or see less of).